Hallbrook Perfumes Number List

Beginning in the mid-1980s, the Canadian company Hallbrook entered the fragrance market with a distinctive concept: producing affordable interpretations of well-known designer perfumes. Rather than duplicating brand names or packaging, Hallbrook created what are often called “impression” or “version” fragrances—scents designed to evoke the character of famous perfumes while remaining legally distinct from the originals. These fragrances were primarily marketed through mail-order catalogs, a common retail format during the 1980s and 1990s that allowed smaller companies to reach customers directly without the expense of department store distribution. Hallbrook’s offerings appealed especially to consumers who admired luxury fragrances but sought a more economical alternative.

One of the most recognizable features of Hallbrook’s perfumes was their minimalist labeling system. Instead of naming each fragrance after the perfume it was inspired by, the bottles were simply marked with numbers. This discreet approach avoided trademark conflicts with the original fragrance houses while still allowing customers to identify their favorite scent through a corresponding list. Without the reference list, however, the bottles could appear mysterious—just numbered flacons with no obvious indication of the perfume they represented.

For those familiar with the system, each number corresponded to a specific fragrance inspiration. For example, No. 1 represented Hallbrook’s version of Giorgio, while No. 2 evoked the opulent oriental style of Opium. No. 3 interpreted the classic aldehydic floral character of Chanel No. 5, and No. 4 captured the floral elegance associated with Oscar de la Renta. Other interpretations included No. 5, inspired by the delicate carnation-spiced freshness of L’Air du Temps; No. 6, echoing the modern fruity-floral style of Escape; and No. 7, modeled after the marine freshness of Gio. The collection continued with No. 8 for Trésor, No. 9 for Beautiful, No. 10 for the classic floral Joy, No. 11 for Obsession, and No. 12 for the dramatic, spicy floral Poison.

The line also included No. 13, inspired by the radiant white-floral bouquet of Amarige; No. 14, reflecting the lush oriental character of Passion; No. 15, based on the bold floral-spice style of Red; No. 16, capturing the fresh romantic profile of Eternity; No. 17, modeled after the glamorous aldehydic floral White Diamonds; and No. 18, inspired by the sunny floral sweetness of Sung. Over time, this numbered system became part of Hallbrook’s identity, turning their perfumes into something like a coded fragrance collection known primarily to loyal customers who recognized the numbers and their corresponding inspirations.

Despite the simplicity of their presentation, Hallbrook fragrances found a steady audience among perfume enthusiasts who appreciated the opportunity to experience familiar scent profiles at a more accessible price point. The company’s mail-order approach and straightforward numbering system created a practical, almost utilitarian alternative to luxury perfume marketing—focusing less on elaborate packaging and more on recreating the olfactory style of iconic fragrances. Even today, these numbered perfumes continue to circulate through mail-order and specialty retailers, remaining a curious and enduring example of the “inspired by” fragrance tradition within the perfume industry.

Their bottles are only marked with numbers, so if you don't know what the number corresponds to you can use this list below:
#1. Their version of Giorgio
#2. Their version of Opium
#3. Their version of Chanel No. 5
#4. Their version of Oscar de la Renta
#5. Their version of L'Air du Temps
#6. Their version of Escape
#7. Their version of Gio
#8. Their version of Tresor
#9. Their version of Beautiful
#10. Their version of Joy
#11. Their version of Obsession
#12. Their version of Poison
#13. Their version of Amarige
#14. Their version of Passion
#15. Their version of Red
#16. Their version of Eternity
#17. Their version of White Diamonds
#18. Their version of Sung