La Rose by Rochas was launched in 1949, a moment when French couture and perfumery were fully reawakening after the privations of World War II. The choice of the name La Rose was both direct and deeply symbolic. French in origin, the phrase simply means “The Rose". Few words in perfumery carry such immediate resonance: la rose evokes timeless beauty, romance, femininity, and refinement, calling to mind velvety petals, soft color, and emotional warmth. It suggests intimacy rather than drama, elegance rather than excess—qualities perfectly aligned with Rochas’ aesthetic. For women of the late 1940s, a perfume called La Rose would have felt reassuringly familiar yet quietly luxurious, offering comfort, grace, and continuity in a rapidly modernizing world.
The perfume emerged during the early postwar period, often referred to as the dawn of the New Look era, when fashion embraced a renewed celebration of femininity through cinched waists, full skirts, and opulent fabrics. In perfumery, this translated into fragrances that were polished, radiant, and emotionally uplifting. Women who had endured years of austerity gravitated toward scents that restored a sense of beauty and softness, and rose—long the queen of flowers—held enduring appeal. Interpreted in scent, La Rose was not meant to be a literal soliflore but rather an elegant abstraction: aldehydes provided brightness and lift, florals brought depth and refinement, and a chypre base grounded the composition with sophistication and longevity.

Created by Edmond Roudnitska and later reformulated by Mme Thérèse Roudnitska, La Rose was the result of more than fifteen years of meticulous work by chemists and perfumers. The extract contained a notably high proportion of natural essences, reflecting a bridge between traditional perfumery and modern technique. Classified as a floral aldehydic chypre with oriental (amber) facets, it balanced freshness and warmth, structure and sensuality.
While rose fragrances had been ubiquitous throughout the 19th century and well into the 20th—so much so that nearly every perfume house had its own version based on shared formulas—Rochas’ La Rose distinguished itself through refinement rather than novelty. Earlier rose perfumes relied almost entirely on natural extracts, tinctures, and infusions; by the turn of the century, synthetics and modern aroma chemicals had begun to supplement or enhance these materials, either to replace costly naturals or to amplify their effect. In introducing La Rose in 1949, Rochas did not seek to reinvent the rose, but to reinterpret it—honoring tradition while embracing modern perfumery’s ability to make the flower more luminous, lasting, and emotionally resonant than ever before.
Inspiration:
In 1949, France celebrated one of its most prestigious horticultural events: the Concours International de Roses de Bagatelle in Paris. Held annually in the Parc de Bagatelle, this international rose competition attracted gardeners, breeders, and enthusiasts from around the world to showcase new rose varieties. Roses were evaluated for their beauty, fragrance, and innovation, with awards such as the Prix du Parfum and other certificates recognizing excellence across multiple categories. The festival was not only a celebration of the rose as a flower but also a cultural event, symbolizing refinement, elegance, and the artistry of French horticulture.
It was in this context that Marcel Rochas created La Rose—a fragrance conceived specifically for this international rose festival. By aligning the perfume with the event, Rochas could emphasize the authenticity and prestige of the scent, connecting it directly to the world’s most celebrated roses. The perfume served as both a tribute to the flower itself and a marketing statement: a rose-inspired fragrance launched in the heart of Paris, during a festival dedicated entirely to roses, would resonate with connoisseurs of both perfumery and horticulture. Creating a perfume for such an event allowed Rochas to highlight the artistry of French fragrance in parallel with the artistry of French rose cultivation, reinforcing the house’s image as a creator of scents that were not only luxurious but culturally and aesthetically meaningful.
The connection between La Rose and the festival also provided a narrative for the fragrance. Just as each rose in the Parc de Bagatelle was meticulously bred for beauty and aroma, the perfume could be presented as the olfactory equivalent: a carefully composed bouquet of natural rose essences and complementary florals, designed to capture the elegance, complexity, and freshness of the rose in full bloom. The association elevated the perfume beyond a mere product—it became a symbolic celebration of the flower, the artistry of its cultivation, and the refinement of French perfumery itself.
Fragrance Composition:
So what does it smell like? La Rose is classified as a floral aldehydic chypre with oriental (amber) facets.
- Top notes: aldehyde C-10, bergamot, lemon, neroli, linalool, green notes, geranium leaves, apricot
- Middle notes: plum, Bulgarian rose otto, geranyl butyrate, citronellyl acetate, sweet pea, lily of the valley, hydroxycitronellal, rhodinol, tea rose absolute, phenylacetaldehyde, oriental rose absolute, phenylethyl alcohol, ylang ylang, methyl anthranilate
- Base notes: isoeugenol, patchouli, oakmoss, sandalwood, rosewood, musk, musk ambrette, ambergris, oakmoss, vanilla, vanillin, Siam benzoin
Scent Profile:
La Rose unfolds as a luminous floral aldehydic chypre with ambered depth, revealing its materials in carefully orchestrated layers that feel both natural and artfully refined. The opening is instantly radiant, led by aldehyde C-10, whose waxy, citrus-peel brightness creates a shimmering, almost effervescent lift—clean yet sensual—amplifying the freshness of the naturals it touches. Bergamot from Calabria, prized for its elegant balance of sweetness and bitterness, sparkles alongside crisp lemon, while neroli introduces a softly honeyed floral glow drawn from Mediterranean orange blossoms.
Linalool, naturally present in many flowers but also reproduced synthetically, smooths the citrus with a gently floral, slightly woody sweetness, while green notes and crushed geranium leaves contribute a leafy sharpness, fresh and aromatic. A subtle apricot nuance adds a velvety fruitiness, hinting at ripeness beneath the brightness and giving the opening a soft, golden warmth.
As the fragrance settles, the heart blooms into a richly nuanced rose accord that feels alive and dimensional rather than literal. Bulgarian rose otto, sourced from the famed Rose Valley, forms the emotional center—deep, honeyed, and faintly spicy, with a complexity unmatched by roses grown elsewhere. Tea rose absolute adds a fresher, greener floral tone, while oriental rose absolute deepens the bouquet with darker, more resinous warmth.
These naturals are expertly enhanced by aroma chemicals that heighten their beauty: phenylethyl alcohol brings a fresh, dewy rose note reminiscent of crushed petals; rhodinol adds rosy-citrus brightness; citronellyl acetate contributes a clean, slightly fruity floral lift; and geranyl butyrate lends a soft, pear-like sweetness that smooths transitions between fruit and flower.
Hydroxycitronellal, iconic in classic perfumery, introduces a creamy, lily-of-the-valley freshness that radiates purity and elegance, while phenylacetaldehyde adds a honeyed, hyacinth-like nuance. Sweet pea and lily of the valley float through the composition like spring air, ylang-ylang offers creamy floral sensuality, and methyl anthranilate—grape-like, slightly animalic—adds depth and warmth, subtly enriching the rose without overpowering it. Plum echoes the apricot note from the opening, now darker and more luscious, giving the heart a softly shadowed richness.
The base of La Rose anchors this floral radiance in a classic chypre structure, warm and enduring. Oakmoss, cool and earthy, provides the unmistakable chypre backbone, its forest-floor bitterness contrasting beautifully with the floral heart. Patchouli adds depth and dryness, while sandalwood contributes a creamy, velvety woodiness that softens the mossy edges.
Rosewood enhances the floral-woody bridge, reinforcing the rose theme with gentle spice. Isoeugenol introduces clove-like warmth, subtly echoing the rose’s natural spiciness. Musk and musk ambrette lend a soft, skin-like sensuality, while ambergris—saline, animalic, and radiant—gives the fragrance its lingering glow and diffusion. Vanilla and vanillin wrap the base in a delicate sweetness, not gourmand but comforting, while Siam benzoin adds a balsamic, resinous warmth with hints of caramel and incense, completing the ambered undertone.
Together, these elements create a rose that feels both timeless and modern: natural essences elevated by carefully chosen synthetics that extend their beauty, enhance their clarity, and ensure lasting presence on the skin. La Rose does not merely smell of roses—it breathes, shimmers, and endures, embodying the refined elegance of postwar French perfumery at its most accomplished.
Bottles:
Rochas’ La Rose was presented in an exquisite amphora-shaped crystal flacon, a form first introduced a few years earlier with Femme but here refined to suit the fragrance’s lyrical, floral character. The pressed and molded clear glass bottle rests on a ribbed foot, its softly rounded, bulging body rising with sculptural grace to a flared, ringed neck. It is crowned with a disc-shaped stopper, bearing a paper label inscribed with the perfume’s name and secured with a traditional baudruchage cord. Originally designed by Marc Lalique, the flacon exemplifies the harmonious marriage of elegance and precision for which both Rochas and Lalique were renowned, transforming the bottle into a timeless work of decorative art. The bottles themselves were produced by Pochet et du Courval, ensuring exceptional quality and consistency in craftsmanship.
The sense of luxury continued in the perfume’s outer presentation. La Rose was housed in an oval lay-down box wrapped in rose-pink paper and lavishly overlaid with genuine black Chantilly lace, a poetic reference to the delicate, diaphanous fabrics central to Rochas’ couture heritage. Inside, the bottle reclines in a nest of soft white tulle, a tactile contrast that heightens the visual drama and underscores the fragrance’s refined femininity. Within the Rochas color palette, La Rose’s rosy pink distinguished it clearly from the pure white of Femme, the soft gray of Moustache, the serene blue of Mouche, and the chartreuse of Mousseline, each hue carefully chosen to reinforce the individuality of the scent it enclosed.

Designed by Albert Gosset, the packaging’s lace motif subtly recalls the legendary corset Rochas created for Mae West, linking La Rose to the house’s most iconic couture moments. Through this thoughtful interplay of form, color, and material, La Rose was elevated beyond a simple perfume into a true objet d’art—an heirloom-worthy creation that beckoned from the vanity with the same nuanced allure and quiet sophistication as the fragrance it contained.
To open the classic crystal parfum flacon, use the following tip provided by Parfums Marcel Rochas themselves in 1963:
"Use a razor blade to slit the plastic casing that surrounds the top. Then heat the bottle neck with a match."
The Parfum was originally available in four sizes, prices ranged from $25, $22.50, $15, and $9 in 1949, by 1950 another was available for $40 (the deluxe edition in the oval laydown box, interior lined with tulle).
La Rose was available in Parfum in five sizes:
- 1/4 oz (7.3 ml stands 2.25" tall
- 1/2 oz (also listed as 0.44 oz or 13.3 ml) stands 3.25" tall
- 0.7 oz (23 ml) stands 3.34" tall.
- 1 oz (25 ml) stands 3.75" tall
- 2 oz stands 4.5" tall
The standard presentation of La Rose parfum featured the house’s iconic amphora-shaped bottle standing upright in the base of an oval cardstock slipcover box, its proportions carefully calibrated so the flacon nestled securely and elegantly in place. The box was wrapped in rose-pink paper printed with a delicate black Chantilly lace motif, creating a refined visual harmony between bottle and case and echoing Rochas’ couture sensibility. An alternate presentation offered a more understated yet equally graceful interpretation: an oval cardboard box covered in the same rose-pink paper but decorated with a softer black tulle pattern and discreetly labeled with the fragrance’s name. Together, these variations maintained a cohesive identity while allowing subtle nuances in texture and ornamentation, underscoring the thoughtful artistry that characterized Rochas’ packaging for La Rose.







Purse Flacons:
Rochas created two elegant miniatures of La Rose, designed to accompany a woman’s day with style and practicality. The simpler version, known as the “purse flacon” or “pebble,” combined charm and refinement. Its clear glass body, molded into a flattened disk shape, was topped with a gilt metal ball screw-cap and adorned with a small round gold foil label. Standing approximately 2.25 inches tall, the bottle held 0.25 oz of parfum and was nestled in an antelope suede bag with a delicate satin rope handle, making it both a fashionable accessory and a convenient way to carry the fragrance on the go.
Pebble Flacon:
Another delightful miniature of La Rose was the smaller version of the “pebble” flacon, a design created for effortless portability in a handbag. This tiny, disk-shaped bottle of clear glass, topped with a simple black plastic or gilt metal screw cap, was both charming and practical for everyday use. Its presentation set it apart: the flacon was suspended by a cord from an oval rose pink-colored paper card, decorated with a printed black Chantilly lace pattern that mirrored the elegance of the full-size packaging. Measuring just 1 3/8 inches tall by 1 inch in diameter and holding one dram (1/8 oz) of parfum, it is considered a “micro-mini” perfume bottle. Some examples were also housed in a small rectangular box covered with the same patterned paper. Today, pebble flacons that remain attached to their original cards are rare and highly collectible, offering a charming glimpse into the couture-inspired attention to detail that Rochas applied even to its smallest creations.

La Rose Eau de Jeunesse:
Like many creations from the house of Rochas, La Rose was also offered in an Eau de Jeunesse, poetically described as “Water of Youth,” a lighter, more carefree expression available across the Rochas fragrance line, first introduced with Femme and La Rose in 1947. Presented in the familiar amphora-shaped bottle—fitted with either a glass stopper or a practical black plastic screw cap—this version was sold in generous 4, 8, and 10-ounce sizes, clearly intended for lavish, everyday use rather than sparing application. In technical terms, an Eau de Jeunesse corresponds to what is more commonly known as an Eau de Toilette: a lower concentration of aromatic oils, typically around 5 to 15 percent, diluted in alcohol and water. This made it ideal for splashing freely over the body, hair, or clothing, imparting freshness and radiance without the depth or persistence of the parfum.
Like many house creations, La Rose’s Eau de Jeunesse—Rochas’ poetic term for a lighter, everyday version of the fragrance—was formulated to offer the essence of the parfum while remaining airy, fresh, and easily wearable. While the parfum presents a dense, complex structure with rich Bulgarian rose, layered oriental resins, and a full chypre base of oakmoss, patchouli, and woods, the Eau de Jeunesse was intentionally simplified to emphasize the luminous, upper floral notes. Ingredients that contribute depth, weight, and long-lasting intensity—such as ambergris, benzoin, vanilla, or heavy resins like Siam benzoin—were often reduced or omitted, allowing the rose and supporting florals to shine in a brighter, more immediate way. Similarly, woody or mossy accents, like sandalwood, rosewood, and oakmoss, would have been muted, creating a softer, ephemeral trail rather than a lingering base.
At the same time, the Eau de Jeunesse retained much of the character of the parfum’s heart, so that the signature rose remained unmistakable. Bulgarian rose otto, tea rose absolute, oriental rose absolute, and subtle floral modifiers like lily of the valley, sweet pea, or ylang-ylang were preserved in lighter proportions to maintain richness without heaviness. Volatile top notes—bergamot, lemon, neroli, and fresh green nuances—might even have been slightly emphasized to give the Eau de Jeunesse its sparkling, airy quality. Aroma chemicals such as hydroxycitronellal or phenylethyl alcohol could be adjusted to boost the freshness and projection of the rose while compensating for the reduction in deeper base elements.
The result was a perfume that felt like the parfum’s lighter shadow: airy, elegant, and skin-fresh. It offered a rose that was less opulent and more translucent—crisp, lightly green, and softly floral—perfect for generous application across the body and suitable for daily wear. In essence, the Eau de Jeunesse captured the spirit and elegance of La Rose, translating its luxurious heart into a form that felt refreshing, approachable, and radiantly youthful.
In scent, the Eau de Jeunesse of La Rose would have felt lighter, airier, and more transparent than the extrait, yet unmistakably rose-centered. Contemporary descriptions evoke the Bulgarian rose in a particularly vivid way: green-tinged, faintly bitter, and subtly spicy, with a patrician elegance that feels both refined and alive. As described in Combat in 1954, this rose carries a near-amethyst depth, threaded with darker, almost shadowed nuances, yet softened for warmth and wearability. In its diluted form, the flower seems to draw in its thorns and relax its velvet petals, becoming a cooling, refreshing veil for skin warmed by summer. The effect would have been less ornate than the parfum—more like crushed petals and stems caught in a morning breeze—fresh, slightly green, and gently floral rather than opulent or heady.
Combat, 1954:
"Eau à La Rose by Marcel Rochas captures the Bulgarian rose—the rose of gardens that already belong to the Orient, the very flower Anna de Noailles dreamed of in the languor of her Parisian bedroom. Nearly amethyst in hue, threaded with dark veins, it possesses a patrician aroma that is at once slightly treacherous, faintly bitter, and delicately green. Here, that rose is enclosed in crystal, so true to life that a bee might be deceived. It seems to soften its velvet petals and withdraw its thorns, becoming a fragrance meant to refresh the skin of a woman warmed by summer—fragile as the rose itself, and as beautifully in bloom."


Packaging for the Eau de Jeunesse reflected this lighter spirit. While still housed in the signature amphora bottle, it came in boxes with a simpler pink background and a fine netted tulle motif, a quieter counterpart to the Chantilly lace used for the parfum. In 1949, the Eau de Jeunesse was offered in two sizes, retailing for $12.50 and $8, positioning it as an accessible luxury for daily pleasure. As the term “Eau de Jeunesse” gradually fell out of use—perhaps misunderstood by consumers—Rochas began labeling the fragrance more straightforwardly as Eau de Toilette, returning it to the familiar pink boxes printed with black Chantilly lace. Regardless of name, this version of La Rose embodied freshness, youth, and ease: a rose meant not for ceremony, but for living.

La Rose Eau de Cologne:
Like many of Rochas’ perfumes, La Rose was also offered in an Eau de Cologne form—a lighter, more bracing interpretation designed for generous, everyday use. Traditionally, cologne occupied the most casual end of the fragrance spectrum, intended to refresh rather than envelop. It was meant to be splashed freely over the body after bathing, dabbed onto the hair, or even used to lightly scent linens and clothing. In this form, La Rose would have felt airy and immediate, offering a fleeting but invigorating impression of the fragrance rather than the lingering depth of the parfum.
In terms of scent, the Eau de Cologne would have emphasized brightness and clarity. The rose would appear in a fresher, more transparent guise—suggestive of crushed petals and green stems rather than a full, velvety bloom. Sparkling citrus notes such as bergamot and lemon would likely have been brought to the foreground, lending a crisp, almost effervescent opening, while neroli or light herbal facets could add a cooling, aromatic lift. These volatile top notes would bloom quickly on the skin and fade gracefully, leaving behind only a whisper of rose and soft greenery. Any heavier base elements—woods, resins, or mosses—would be greatly subdued or absent, ensuring the overall effect remained clean, light, and fleeting.
The distinction between Eau de Toilette and Eau de Cologne lies primarily in concentration and structure. While an Eau de Toilette typically contains around 5–15% aromatic oils and retains a clear heart and base, an Eau de Cologne is even more dilute, often in the range of 2–5%, and built to showcase top notes above all else. Cologne formulas rely heavily on citrus oils, aromatic herbs, light florals, and minimal fixatives, favoring freshness and immediacy over longevity. In La Rose Cologne, this would translate into a composition that feels more like a refreshing rose-infused splash than a traditional perfume—delicate, cooling, and ideal for repeated application throughout the day.
Packaging for the Eau de Cologne reflected its practical elegance. It was presented in the familiar amphora-shaped bottle fitted with a black plastic screw cap, housed in boxes decorated with the black Chantilly lace motif against a pink background. In 1949, the cologne was offered in three sizes, priced at $5, $8, and $12.50, underscoring its role as an accessible luxury. By 1962, it was also available in a convenient 1.5-ounce spray bottle, aligning the timeless romance of La Rose with modern habits of freshness and ease.
- 1.8 oz Eau de Cologne Splash, bottle stands 3.75" tall
- 2 oz Eau de Cologne Splash
- 4 oz Eau de Cologne Splash stands 5" tall.
- 5.75" tall


Parfum de Toilette:
In 1958, Rochas expanded the La Rose line with the introduction of the Parfum de Toilette, a concentration roughly equivalent to what we now consider a modern Eau de Parfum. This formulation struck a balance between the richness of the original parfum and the lighter freshness of the Eau de Jeunesse or Eau de Cologne. The Parfum de Toilette was designed to offer more projection and longevity than an Eau de Toilette, while remaining easier and more versatile to wear than the full-strength extract. It allowed women to enjoy the full sophistication of La Rose without the intensity or cost of the parfum. To complement this innovation, Rochas introduced convenient metered spray bottles and the Pursatomizer, a metered atomizer encased in a sleek black etched silvery shaft, making precise, controlled application possible for the first time in this concentration.
The Parfum de Toilette retained the heart of La Rose, with its Bulgarian rose otto, tea rose absolute, oriental rose absolute, and subtle supporting florals such as lily of the valley, sweet pea, and ylang-ylang forming the signature bouquet. Top notes of bergamot, lemon, neroli, and green accents were preserved, though slightly softened to integrate seamlessly with the more substantial middle and base. Compared to the full-strength parfum, heavier and long-lasting base ingredients—ambergris, Siam benzoin, vanilla, sandalwood, oakmoss, and patchouli—were lightly reduced or subtly blended to maintain elegance without overpowering the wearer. In contrast to an Eau de Toilette, the Parfum de Toilette offered a richer, more structured floral-amber depth, while still more restrained and airy than the dense parfum. Compared to an Eau de Cologne, which highlighted only the sparkling top notes with minimal base, the Parfum de Toilette provided a rounded, more enduring composition that revealed the rose in its full sophistication while remaining wearable and luminous.
Packaging for the Parfum de Toilette reflected this blend of elegance and modernity. The familiar rose-pink background and black Chantilly lace motif was retained, now featuring a white oval at the center displaying the perfume’s name, uniting tradition with clarity. The metered sprays and Pursatomizer also represented a forward-thinking approach to perfumery, making La Rose accessible in a contemporary, practical format while preserving the luxurious character and signature elegance of Rochas’ design.
Sometimes the bottles or boxes are not marked as to size, so I created a handy guide to help you figure out what size your bottle is based on the height measurements.
This is the guide for the Parfum de Toilette splash bottles.
- stands 3" tall.
- 1 oz stands 3.5" tall
- 1.7 oz stands 3.75" tall
- 3.5 oz stands 4.75" tall.
- 6.8 oz stands 6" tall.
- 13.5 oz stands 7" tall.
Fate of the Fragrance:
La Rose by Rochas was launched in 1949, at a moment when French perfumery was reasserting its authority through refinement, craftsmanship, and emotional resonance. Almost immediately, the fragrance drew attention for its elusive character on the skin. The New Yorker observed that La Rose possessed a “puzzling way” of revealing itself differently from one wearer to another—sometimes reading as pure rose, sometimes allowing hints of sweet pea, lily of the valley, or other garden flowers to surface, always underscored by a gentle touch of greenery. This variability became part of its charm, suggesting a living flower rather than a fixed, literal interpretation.
Critical acclaim followed. Writing in L’Amour de l’Art in 1950, critics emphasized the extraordinary effort behind the perfume: more than fifteen years of work by chemists and perfumers, resulting in an extract composed with a notably high proportion of natural essences. The review suggested that La Rose transcended technical description, asserting that it simply was the Rose itself—complete, poetic, and emotionally charged. It evoked the rose of Guillaume Apollinaire’s verse, a flower likened to the soft curve of a hip, beloved despite its thorns, and celebrated for the beauty worth risking pain to touch. This literary association reinforced La Rose as a fragrance of intimacy, sensuality, and idealized femininity.
By the early 1950s, La Rose was firmly established among the great floral perfumes of its time. Harper’s Bazaar grouped it with other iconic rose-centered fragrances, noting Rochas’ interpretation as “fresh-blooming,” distinct from Caron’s delicacy or Patou’s opulent rose-and-jasmine richness. In 1952, Jet magazine introduced American audiences to Rochas’ Parisian perfume collection, describing La Rose succinctly and decisively as “all rose,” positioning it as the most exquisite and emotionally direct offering within the house’s range. The fragrance was presented in elegant gift sets alongside Femme, Mousseline, Mouche, and Moustache, reinforcing Rochas’ image as a complete and sophisticated perfume wardrobe.
As the decade progressed, La Rose became associated with a particular kind of sentiment and social meaning. Realities magazine in 1955 noted that while perfumes like Femme were considered universally appropriate, the French favored La Rose for aunts—suggesting a fragrance of refinement, affection, and tasteful restraint rather than overt seduction. By 1960, The News Journal framed the perfume as a message in itself, stating that when a man gifted La Rose to a woman, it could mean only one thing: “you are the rose of my life.” The fragrance had become a symbolic gesture, expressing admiration and devotion through scent.
Even into the late 1960s and early 1970s, La Rose retained its reputation for sincerity and elegance. House & Garden described it in 1970 as “tender and true,” underscoring its faithful, unembellished devotion to the rose theme. Priced at $10 for a quarter-ounce, it remained accessible yet luxurious. Discontinued by 1973, La Rose has since become increasingly difficult to find, surviving today as a treasured relic of mid-20th-century French perfumery—one that captured the rose not as an ornament, but as an enduring emotional truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments will be subject to approval by a moderator. Comments may fail to be approved if the moderator deems that they:
--contain unsolicited advertisements ("spam")
--are unrelated to the subject matter of the post or of subsequent approved comments
--contain personal attacks or abusive/gratuitously offensive language