Showing posts with label Parfumerie Vivaudou. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Parfumerie Vivaudou. Show all posts

Saturday, March 22, 2014

Parfumerie Vivaudou

V. Vivaudou Inc. occupies an unusual and fascinating place within twentieth-century perfumery because it was neither entirely French nor entirely American, but rather a carefully constructed union of both worlds. Founded in 1915 by Victor Vivaudou, a French-American entrepreneur, the company emerged during a period when French perfume culture was beginning to exert enormous influence upon the American market. Operating from 418 West 25th Street in New York City, with Parisian representation at 15 Rue Royale, Vivaudou positioned itself as a house capable of translating French elegance into a form suitable for broader international consumption. Unlike the older Paris houses rooted in aristocratic traditions, Vivaudou represented modernity: a younger company created for a changing world of mass consumer culture, department stores, cosmetics counters, and increasingly fashion-conscious middle-class customers.

Although Vivaudou developed its own identity, it did not emerge independently. The company maintained close ties with the much older Delettrez, formally known as La Parfumerie du Monde Élégant. Evidence strongly suggests that Delettrez was initially responsible for creating the early Vivaudou products and continued to manufacture them for European distribution. This relationship created an effective division within the perfume market. Delettrez specialized in luxury presentations, elaborate artistic packaging, and prestige products, while Vivaudou focused on lower- and medium-priced offerings intended for wider accessibility. Rather than competing with each other, the two brands functioned as complementary entities serving different sectors of the market.




The Vivaudou network extended beyond Delettrez and formed part of a larger constellation of associated companies. Among these were the Parisian firm Arly, Prince de Chany, operating in both Paris and Beverly Hills, Vimay in Los Angeles and Culver City, Vadsco Sales Corporation of Long Island, as well as Mavis and Kyrill. Such affiliations indicate a complex structure of manufacturing, licensing, distribution, and branding extending across France and the United States. During the early twentieth century many perfume and cosmetic enterprises relied upon interconnected companies to manage regional production and market penetration. Vivaudou appears to have participated in this increasingly modern commercial model.

A 1925 biographical article provides important insight into how the house wished to be perceived. It contrasted brands that required years to establish themselves with others that achieved immediate success upon their appearance. According to the article, Vivaudou belonged decisively to the latter category. In America, the company reportedly "needed only to appear to triumph." Such language reflected the extraordinary growth of consumer culture in the years immediately following the First World War.


The timing of the company's emergence was particularly advantageous. The war had profoundly altered social habits and ideals of personal presentation. Beauty, grooming, and hygiene increasingly became associated with modern living and social advancement. The article argued that elegance and hygiene had themselves become luxuries. This change created fertile conditions for a company such as Vivaudou, whose products combined French sophistication with practical accessibility.

Yet the article insisted that fashion alone could not sustain long-term success. Permanent recognition depended upon product quality. Vivaudou emphasized meticulous manufacturing methods and claimed to incorporate the latest scientific discoveries and hygienic advances into its formulations. Such language reflected broader trends within cosmetics during the 1920s, when beauty preparations increasingly adopted the vocabulary of science and modern technology.

The company attempted to balance innovation with tradition. While its names, packaging, and general presentation were described as completely modern, the preparation of the products and the selection of raw materials reportedly remained rooted in classical French methods. This blending of modernity with historical expertise became one of Vivaudou's defining characteristics. Consumers were offered products that felt fashionable and contemporary while still carrying the prestige associated with French perfumery.

The house produced an extensive range of beauty preparations including creams, face powders, soaps, lotions, perfumes, toilet waters, extracts, and related cosmetic products. Contemporary descriptions indicate that these products gained considerable popularity among stylish American women during the 1920s. Rather than selling isolated items, Vivaudou attempted to create complete beauty regimens, allowing customers to surround themselves with a coordinated aesthetic experience.

The company also understood the growing importance of visual presentation. Product names and packaging were described as thoroughly modern and designed to appeal immediately to consumers. As cosmetic counters and department-store displays became increasingly important retail spaces, presentation itself became a decisive factor in commercial success.

The 1925 article also described Vivaudou's European expansion. Since it was considered unjust to deny European women access to products created by a French perfumer working abroad, the company entrusted European production to Société Anonyme Parfumerie du Monde Élégant, namely Delettrez. Contemporary writers considered this arrangement ideal: an alliance between an established and highly respected Parisian house and a younger company with contemporary tastes.

The article singled out several products—Chez Lui, Navis, and Narcisse de Chine—as examples of this partnership's promise. These products were reportedly displayed within a "temple of elegance" at 15 Rue Royale, Paris. Such language illustrates the theatrical atmosphere surrounding luxury beauty retailing during the 1920s. Perfume boutiques increasingly became carefully staged environments intended to immerse customers in a world of glamour and sophistication.

Among Vivaudou's successful products, Narcisse de Chine appears particularly significant. A 1924 report in The Pharmaceutical Era stated that only six months after its introduction the line had already achieved widespread distribution throughout the United States. The company's executives attributed this success partly to the fragrance itself and partly to its attractive packaging.

Marketing efforts surrounding Narcisse de Chine demonstrate Vivaudou's sophisticated understanding of retail promotion. The company commissioned theatrical artist L. R. Hales to create elaborate window displays for retailers. These displays were intended to help merchants sell powders, extracts, toilet waters, and associated products in the line. This approach reflected the increasing importance of visual merchandising during the early twentieth century. Perfume was no longer sold solely through fragrance; it was sold through spectacle and atmosphere.

Victor Vivaudou himself remains a somewhat colorful figure. In 1920, he became involved in a highly publicized customs scandal involving the smuggling of jewelry into the United States. Customs authorities alleged that his wife failed to declare a $10,000 pearl necklace and a $500 diamond ring purchased in France while returning aboard the liner La Lorraine. The combined duty on the items would have amounted to approximately $6,000, a substantial sum for the period.

Acting on prior information, customs inspectors searched the couple and reportedly discovered the ring in Victor Vivaudou's pocket and the necklace concealed beneath Mrs. Vivaudou's clothing. Victor attempted to explain that the necklace was a family heirloom previously brought into America, but authorities rejected the explanation. Subsequent investigations by the United States Attorney's office reportedly produced evidence from Paris indicating that the jewelry had indeed been purchased in the spring of 1919. Victor Vivaudou was eventually fined $5,000.

Although embarrassing, the incident also offers a glimpse into the social world in which perfume entrepreneurs operated. Luxury goods, ocean liners, European travel, jewelry, and transatlantic lifestyles formed part of the same aspirational culture that surrounded perfume and cosmetics during the era.

Vivaudou ultimately represented a transitional model in perfume history. It united Old World French craftsmanship with New World marketing techniques and mass appeal. Through its relationship with Delettrez and its broader network of affiliated companies, it served as a bridge between traditional luxury perfumery and the emerging modern cosmetics industry. Its products, packaging, theatrical advertising, and transatlantic identity made it an important participant in the transformation of perfume from an exclusive luxury into a broader consumer experience.





The perfumes of Vivaudou and its related companies:

  • 1915 Fleur de France
  • 1915 Fortuna
  • 1915 La Boheme (Arly)
  • 1915 Mavis
  • 1915 Lady Mary
  • 1915 Lilas (Arly)
  • 1916 Baby Comfort (Vadsco)
  • 1919 Anulodor (Vadsco)
  • 1919 La Jeunesse (Vadsco)
  • 1919 Pour la France
  • 1919 Jasmin Arly (Arly)
  • 1919 Maiden France (Arly)
  • 1919 Pour La France (Arly)
  • 1920 Myrtis (Vadsco)
  • 1920 Mozart
  • 1920 Mai D'Or (Vadsco)
  • 1920 Parfumex-Vous
  • 1920 Linda Mia
  • 1920 Vivo
  • 1920 Jade d'Or
  • 1920 Naomi
  • 1920 Vivomint (Vadsco)
  • 1920 Encor (Vadsco)
  • 1920 Jasmin Noir
  • 1921 Mai Vou (Vadsco)
  • 1921 Violet (Arly)
  • 1921 Jasmin Rose (Arly)
  • 1922 Rose Arly (Arly)
  • 1922 La Boheme
  • 1923 Narcisse de Chine
  • 1923 Sivam
  • 1924 Boudoirette
  • 1924 Narcisse
  • 1924 Pleasant Memories
  • 1925 Kyrill
  • 1925 Parfum Park Lane
  • 1926 Heure Passionnante
  • 1927 Djer Lady (Vadsco)
  • 1927 Djer One (Vadsco)
  • 1928 Boditan
  • 1928 Emotion (Prince de Chany)
  • 1929 Vrai
  • 1929 Ninique (Vadsco/Arly)
  • 1933 Melbaline (Vadsco)
  • 1933 Rose Arly (Arly)
  • 1934 La Sept Mysterieux
  • 1934 Mystery Gardenia (Prince de Chany)
  • 1934 Nuit Folle (Prince de Chany)
  • 1934 Ninique (Arly)
  • 1934 Le Jeunesse
  • 1934 Sins of Hollywood (Vimay/Prince de Chany)
  • 1935 Emotion (Prince de Chany)
  • 1935 Vivacite (Vadsco)
  • 1935 Nuit Folle
  • 1935 Orange Petals (Vimay/Prince de Chany)
  • 1935 Lost Orchid/Orchidee Perdue (Prince de Chany)
  • 1937 Nuriss (Vadsco)
  • 1937 Le Morocco (Prince de Chany)
  • 1940 Flower Pot
  • 1942 American Blossoms
  • 1943 Babaloo
  • 1945 Attar of Petals
  • Lucky Sambo (launch date unknown)
  • Coronet (Prince de Chany)
  • Dramatic (Prince de Chany)


The perfume catalogue of Vivaudou and its related companies shows a very different strategy from the older luxury house Delettrez. Where Delettrez often favored aristocratic, imperial, and high-society titles, Vivaudou leaned toward approachable glamour, romance, novelty, hygienic modernity, and American department-store appeal. Its perfumes and beauty lines were often designed as complete commercial presentations, suitable for window displays, drugstores, cosmetics counters, and gift sets.

The earliest Vivaudou names reveal the brand’s French identity and patriotic tone. Fleur de France, Fortuna, Lady Mary, Mavis, and Pour la France belong to the company’s founding period around 1915–1919. These names gave the young American-based firm a Parisian aura while remaining easy for English-speaking consumers to remember. Mavis became especially important as a widely recognized Vivaudou name, associated not only with perfume but with a broad range of toilet preparations.

The Arly-affiliated perfumes of the same period, including La Bohème, Lilas, Jasmin Arly, Maiden France, Pour la France, Violet, Jasmin Rose, and Rose Arly, show the more explicitly French floral side of the network. These were direct, graceful, and traditional names, built around lilac, jasmine, rose, violet, and romantic Parisian imagery. They suggest soft, feminine compositions intended for broad appeal rather than highly experimental luxury.

The Vadsco names introduce a more practical and modern toiletry character. Baby Comfort, Anulodor, La Jeunesse, Myrtis, Mai d’Or, Vivomint, Encor, Mai Vou, Djer Lady, Djer One, Melbaline, Vivacité, and Nuriss sound like beauty preparations as much as perfumes. Some imply freshness, youth, deodorizing action, oral care, complexion care, or general personal hygiene. This reflects the 1920s and 1930s shift toward beauty as a daily routine rather than an occasional luxury.

Around 1920, Vivaudou’s own line expanded with names such as Mozart, Parfumex-Vous, Linda Mia, Vivo, Jade d’Or, Naomi, and Jasmin Noir. These titles show a mixture of musical elegance, playful French phrasing, exotic color imagery, feminine names, and darker floral fantasy. Jasmin Noir suggests a richer, more dramatic jasmine than the simple floral waters of earlier years, perhaps with indolic, spicy, or balsamic undertones.

Narcisse de Chine, introduced in 1923, appears to have been one of Vivaudou’s most important successes. Its name combined a familiar floral note, narcissus, with fashionable Chinese exoticism. The line included perfumes, powders, extracts, and toilet waters, and its commercial success seems to have depended as much on packaging and display as on scent. It represents Vivaudou at its most effective: French in tone, exotic in name, visually attractive, and suited to national distribution.

The mid-1920s brought a more intimate and boudoir-oriented vocabulary. Boudoirette, Narcisse, Pleasant Memories, Kyrill, Parfum Park Lane, and Heure Passionnante suggest elegance, romance, nostalgia, and fashionable modern femininity. Park Lane evokes Anglo-American sophistication, while Heure Passionnante—“exciting hour” or “thrilling hour”—belongs to the language of flirtation and evening glamour.

The Prince de Chany and Vimay affiliations introduced a distinctly Hollywood-era character. Emotion, Mystery Gardenia, Nuit Folle, Sins of Hollywood, Orange Petals, Lost Orchid / Orchidée Perdue, Le Morocco, Coronet, and Dramatic all sound theatrical, cinematic, and highly visual. These names suggest perfumes marketed around fantasy, nightlife, exotic travel, screen glamour, and emotional intensity. They fit naturally with Beverly Hills and Los Angeles associations.

Some of these later perfumes suggest specific olfactory directions. Mystery Gardenia was likely a creamy white floral with a dramatic, perhaps slightly narcotic character. Nuit Folle suggests a heavier evening perfume, possibly floral-oriental or ambered. Lost Orchid / Orchidée Perdue evokes a velvety, elusive exotic floral. Orange Petals likely centered on orange blossom or neroli-like sweetness. Le Morocco would have suggested warmth, spice, leather, amber, incense, or desert fantasy.

The 1930s also brought curious, novelty-driven names such as La Sept Mystérieux, Ninique, Le Jeunesse, Boditan, and Vrai. These titles show the network experimenting with mystery, youth, authenticity, and catchy coined words. Such names were useful in mass-market beauty because they were distinctive, trademarkable, and adaptable across perfume, powder, cream, and toiletry lines.

During the 1940s, Vivaudou’s catalogue took on a more American tone with Flower Pot, American Blossoms, Babaloo, and Attar of Petals. These names are lighter, more novelty-oriented, and less dependent on formal French prestige. American Blossoms in particular reflects wartime and postwar patriotic sentiment, while Attar of Petals suggests a concentrated floral perfume built around the romantic idea of distilled blossoms.

One title, Lucky Sambo, reflects a now-offensive racial caricature common in older commercial naming and advertising. Its presence is historically important because it shows how some early twentieth-century beauty companies used racialized novelty names that would be unacceptable today. In an encyclopedic treatment, it should be documented carefully as part of the period record, not repeated as charming or decorative branding.

Taken together, the perfumes of Vivaudou, Arly, Vadsco, Prince de Chany, Vimay, Mavis, and Kyrill reveal a flexible commercial empire built around multiple audiences. Some lines offered French florals, some emphasized hygiene and daily toiletries, some leaned into department-store romance, and others borrowed the drama of Hollywood. The group’s strength was adaptability: it could sell Parisian elegance, youthful freshness, exotic fantasy, theatrical glamour, and affordable beauty under related but distinct names.





This unusual bottle was also used for the perfume Lost Orchid/Orchidee Perdue.






Vivaudou's Mavis line included matching products: perfume, toilet water, cologne, talcum powder, lipstick, face powder, and rouge. Mavis was discontinued by 1936.







The perfumes of Arly:

  • 1915 La Boheme
  • 1915 Fleur de France
  • 1915 Lilas Arly
  • 1919 Jasmin Arly
  • 1919 Maiden France
  • 1919 Pour La France
  • 1921 Violette Arly
  • 1921 Jasmin Rose
  • 1922 Rose Arly
  • 1922 La Boheme
  • 1929 Vrai
  • 1929 Ninique


Welcome!

Welcome to my unique perfume blog! Here, you'll find detailed, encyclopedic entries about perfumes and companies, complete with facts and photos for easy research. This site is not affiliated with any perfume companies; it's a reference source for collectors and enthusiasts who cherish classic fragrances. My goal is to highlight beloved, discontinued classics and show current brand owners the demand for their revival. Your input is invaluable! Please share why you liked a fragrance, describe its scent, the time period you wore it, any memorable occasions, or what it reminded you of. Did a relative wear it, or did you like the bottle design? Your stories might catch the attention of brand representatives. I regularly update posts with new information and corrections. Your contributions help keep my entries accurate and comprehensive. Please comment and share any additional information you have. Together, we can keep the legacy of classic perfumes alive!