Tuesday, March 5, 2019

Calisher & Company

A.B. Calisher & Co. represents one of the many important but now largely overlooked perfume houses that helped shape the American fragrance industry during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Established in 1893 in New York City and located at 112 Franklin Street, the company was founded by brothers Aaron B. Calisher, Joseph H. Calisher, and Nathan Calisher. The firm emerged during a period when American perfumery was rapidly expanding and beginning to establish its own identity rather than relying solely upon imported European fragrances. New York had become one of the principal centers of American perfume manufacturing, making Franklin Street an ideal location for a company entering the increasingly competitive fragrance market.

The story of Aaron B. Calisher himself reflects the movement and entrepreneurial energy common among many nineteenth-century businessmen. Born in Richmond, Virginia, in 1857, he received his education through the city's public schools before beginning his commercial life in Chicago. His move to New York in 1892 proved pivotal, occurring just one year before the establishment of Calisher & Co. Together with his brothers, he entered the perfume manufacturing business at a time when scented toiletries, perfumes, soaps, and cosmetic preparations were becoming increasingly important consumer products. The fact that he remained actively involved with the company until his death suggests that perfumery was not merely an investment but a central professional pursuit.

Aaron Calisher's importance extended beyond his own business enterprise into the broader American fragrance industry. He was a prominent member of the Manufacturing Perfumers' Association, one of the principal trade organizations representing perfume manufacturers in the United States. Trade associations during this era played a major role in establishing standards, encouraging cooperation among manufacturers, and addressing the many practical challenges facing the industry, including sourcing materials, regulation, and production practices. Aaron's active participation indicates that he was not simply a manufacturer operating independently, but an influential figure within the larger professional community.

His colleagues clearly held him in considerable respect. In 1910, at the sixteenth annual convention of the Manufacturing Perfumers' Association, he was unanimously elected treasurer. Such unanimous election suggests a strong level of trust and professional admiration. His repeated reelections in the years that followed indicate that his financial oversight and organizational contributions were highly valued. Contemporary descriptions emphasize not only his competence but also the esteem in which fellow members regarded him. Beyond his business activities, he was also involved in Freemasonry and various social organizations, reflecting the civic and fraternal engagement that characterized many successful businessmen of the period.

Aaron Calisher's death in 1917 marked a significant turning point for the company. His obituary portrays a respected businessman whose influence extended well beyond his own firm. Funeral services were conducted from his residence, and he was survived by his wife and daughter. Yet the subsequent history of the company suggests that the loss of leadership may have contributed to increasing difficulties during the years that followed.

By the early 1920s, the surviving Calisher brother, Joseph H. Calisher, found himself facing major business challenges. Following the deaths of both Aaron and Nathan Calisher within a relatively short period, Joseph assumed active control over company affairs. Reports from The American Perfumer and Essential Oil Review in 1922 describe severe financial difficulties connected with Oakley & Co., which Joseph owned and managed after the deaths of his brothers. Bankruptcy proceedings had been initiated by creditors, though Joseph remained optimistic about reorganization and continuation under existing management.

Particularly revealing is Joseph Calisher's explanation of the company's problems, which highlights how dependent perfume manufacturers were upon access to alcohol. During this era, alcohol was not simply a beverage product but one of the most essential raw materials in perfume production. Joseph claimed that government officials had misplaced affidavits necessary for alcohol withdrawal permits, preventing the company from obtaining alcohol supplies for approximately three weeks. Such an interruption could be catastrophic, especially during the crucial Christmas sales season. Without alcohol, perfume production and bottling effectively came to a halt, making it impossible to fill orders during one of the busiest periods of the year.

This incident illustrates how perfume manufacturing in the early twentieth century could be affected by broader regulatory systems and bureaucratic complications. Particularly during the years surrounding Prohibition and changing alcohol regulations, perfumers faced unique challenges because one of their most important ingredients was increasingly subject to governmental oversight. Delays in obtaining permits or supplies could directly threaten a company's survival.

The history of A.B. Calisher & Co. therefore represents more than the story of a single perfume house. It reflects the broader realities of early American perfumery: family-operated businesses, close professional networks, dependence upon specialized materials, and vulnerability to economic and regulatory pressures. Although the company itself may not possess the modern recognition of larger fragrance houses, its story provides an important glimpse into the personalities and challenges that shaped the development of the American perfume industry.


The perfumes of Calisher:

  • 1903 Coronet
  • 1903 Dew of Roses
  • 1903 Dew of Violets
  • 1903 Rose de Perse
  • 1903 Sweet Marie Cologne
  • 1903 Violet Esterel
  • 1903 Wood Violet
  • 1903 Jockey Club
  • 1903 White Lilac
  • 1908 Violet Divine
  • 1908 Cut Roses
  • 1908 Cut Violets
  • 1908 Fresh Roses
  • 1908 Gloriana
  • 1908 Princess Perfume
  • 1908 Bouquet Jeunesse
  • 1910 Violet Concentree

The surviving perfume list of A.B. Calisher & Co. presents a relatively compact but revealing view into the company's aesthetic direction during the early twentieth century. Although the known catalog is much smaller than those of giant houses such as Colgate or other established perfume firms of the period, the names suggest a company focused heavily on elegance, floral refinement, and fashionable feminine tastes. Rather than producing highly exotic or abstract perfumes, Calisher appears to have concentrated on themes that emphasized romance, freshness, and social sophistication.

The earliest known perfumes from 1903 reflect the continuing popularity of classic nineteenth-century fragrance traditions. Names such as Dew of Roses, Dew of Violets, and Wood Violet belong to a style of perfume naming intended to suggest delicacy and natural beauty rather than powerful or dramatic compositions. The use of the word "dew" is especially characteristic of the period. Perfume advertising frequently employed imagery of morning flowers covered in dew to evoke purity, freshness, and softness. Such names attempted to create emotional impressions of nature in its most idealized state—flowers at dawn, untouched gardens, and spring landscapes.

Roses and violets dominate the Calisher catalog, which is unsurprising considering the tremendous popularity of these floral themes during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Dew of Roses, Fresh Roses, Cut Roses, and Rose de Perse suggest several different interpretations of rose fragrance. Each title likely attempted to emphasize a different mood or character. Fresh Roses may have sought to capture the scent of newly gathered blossoms, while Cut Roses implied flowers freshly removed from the garden and placed indoors. Rose de Perse, or "Rose of Persia," introduced an exotic geographical element, likely suggesting deeper, richer rose notes inspired by the legendary rose-growing traditions associated with the East.

Violets seem to have been particularly important to Calisher's fragrance identity. The repeated appearance of Dew of Violets, Wood Violet, Cut Violets, Violet Divine, and Violet Concentrée demonstrates the enormous popularity of violet perfumes during this period. Violets occupied a special place in perfumery because they represented delicacy, modesty, and refined femininity. Ironically, real violet blossoms yield virtually no usable essential oil, meaning these perfumes relied heavily upon synthetic aroma materials such as ionones, which had revolutionized perfumery in the late nineteenth century. The introduction of such synthetic materials made realistic violet fragrances possible and contributed to their widespread popularity.

Some of the perfume names suggest a movement toward more romantic and socially aspirational themes. Princess Perfume, Bouquet Jeunesse, and Gloriana appear designed to evoke elegance and idealized femininity. Bouquet Jeunesse, meaning "Bouquet of Youth," carries a youthful and optimistic tone, while Princess Perfume suggests aristocratic sophistication and fantasy. Gloriana has particularly interesting associations, recalling literary and historical imagery of queenship and grandeur, most notably linked with idealized portrayals of royalty.

The inclusion of Jockey Club shows Calisher drawing upon one of the great established perfume traditions of the nineteenth century. Jockey Club had already become a classic fragrance style known internationally, generally associated with refined masculine floral and citrus compositions. By using such a recognized perfume identity, Calisher was participating in a fragrance tradition that consumers already understood and trusted.

One especially intriguing entry is Coronet. Unlike the straightforward floral titles that dominate the catalog, this name suggests status, nobility, and ornamentation. A coronet is a small crown associated with aristocracy, and the perfume may have been intended to project elegance and social prestige. Similar naming practices became increasingly common during the period, as perfume marketing moved beyond merely describing ingredients and began selling aspirations and identities.

The progression from the 1903 perfumes through Violet Concentrée in 1910 also hints at changing consumer preferences. The term Concentrée suggests greater richness and strength, reflecting a growing interest in more concentrated fragrance forms and sophisticated French-inspired presentation. Such terminology carried an air of luxury and imported refinement, even for American-made perfumes.

Taken together, Calisher's surviving fragrances suggest a company that specialized in soft florals and romantic imagery rather than bold experimentation. The line evokes an era of lace-trimmed dressing tables, fresh-cut bouquets, powder puffs, and elegant toilette rituals. Though small in surviving number, these perfumes reveal how A.B. Calisher positioned itself within the early American perfume market—through refinement, femininity, and timeless floral elegance.


No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments will be subject to approval by a moderator. Comments may fail to be approved if the moderator deems that they:
--contain unsolicited advertisements ("spam")
--are unrelated to the subject matter of the post or of subsequent approved comments
--contain personal attacks or abusive/gratuitously offensive language

Welcome!

Welcome to my unique perfume blog! Here, you'll find detailed, encyclopedic entries about perfumes and companies, complete with facts and photos for easy research. This site is not affiliated with any perfume companies; it's a reference source for collectors and enthusiasts who cherish classic fragrances. My goal is to highlight beloved, discontinued classics and show current brand owners the demand for their revival. Your input is invaluable! Please share why you liked a fragrance, describe its scent, the time period you wore it, any memorable occasions, or what it reminded you of. Did a relative wear it, or did you like the bottle design? Your stories might catch the attention of brand representatives. I regularly update posts with new information and corrections. Your contributions help keep my entries accurate and comprehensive. Please comment and share any additional information you have. Together, we can keep the legacy of classic perfumes alive!